home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- > I think the Afterburner uses a 32-bit bus to access it's local FastRAM,
- > but it havn't got any cache like the Hawk does. If I have understod it
- > correctly an PC with the cache disabled is useless, so I think the same
- > thing happens to the Afterburner (not to the same extent, but almost).
-
- Ohhhh no no no. The AfterBurner is 10 times faster when running in FastRAM!
-
- > And when I say that the Hawk is faster, we talk about very small differences.
- > Maybe just a few percent in some cases. Ofcourse the Afterburner will be faster
- > in some areas, but on the whole the Hawk is said to be faster and it's doomed
- > to be more compatible as it uses an 030 and that is a bonus I think. The Hawk
- > does also have more options later if you get alot of cash, like a graphics card
- > (it's said to be _very_ fast) an video grabber (broadcast quality) and a 486 PC
- > emulator.
-
- IF the Hawk comes out, how long will it take for WizzTronics to get these other
- three cards out ?
-
- Keep Cool and Flying...
-
- ChainXOR...
-
-